Anvay's MCQ Blog
Overview
I recently completed an AP Computer Science Principles MCQ practice exam, and overall, my performance was strong. I answered 64/67 questions correctly, demonstrating a solid understanding of algorithms, programming, and computational principles. Below is a detailed breakdown of my results, including my overall performance, key mistakes, and areas for improvement.
Performance Breakdown
Big Idea Analysis
Big Idea | Number of Questions | Average Performance % |
---|---|---|
AAP: Algorithms and Programming | 38 | 92% |
CRD: Creative Development # | 9 | 100% |
CSN: Computing Systems and Networks | 6 | 100% |
DAT: Data | 13 | 100% |
IOC: Impact of Computing | 9 | 100% |
Practice Area Performance
Practice | Number of Questions | Average Performance % |
---|---|---|
Practice 6: Contribute to an inclusive, safe, collaborative, and ethical computing culture. | 0 | NA |
Practice 5: Investigate computing innovations. | 18 | 100% |
Practice 4: Evaluate and test algorithms and programs. | 12 | 92% |
Practice 3: Develop programs that incorporate abstractions. | 7 | 86% |
Practice 2: Develop and implement algorithms. | 13 | 100% |
Practice 1: Design and evaluate computational solutions for a purpose. | 17 | 94% |
Skill-Based Performance
Skill | Number of Questions | Average Performance % |
---|---|---|
Skill 5.E: Evaluate the use of computing based on legal and ethical factors. | 4 | 100% |
Skill 5.D: Describe the impact of gathering data. | 2 | 100% |
Skill 5.C: Describe the impact of a computing innovation. | 1 | 100% |
Skill 5.B: Explain how knowledge can be generated from data. | 7 | 100% |
Skill 5.A: Explain how computing systems work. | 4 | 100% |
Skill 4.C: Identify and correct errors in algorithms and programs. | 7 | 100% |
Skill 4.B: Determine the result of code segments. | 5 | 80% |
Skill 3.B: Use abstraction to manage complexity in a program. | 5 | 80% |
Skill 2.B: Implement and apply an algorithm. | 11 | 100% |
Skill 1.D: Evaluate solution options. | 12 | 92% |
Questions I Got Wrong: Analysis and Improvement
1. Reasonable Time Algorithms
Question Overview
This question tested my understanding of algorithm efficiency and what constitutes reasonable runtime performance.
My Answer (Incorrect): III only
Correct Answer: I, II, and III
Why I Got It Wrong
- I assumed that only algorithm III (which accesses a fixed number of elements) was reasonable.
- However, algorithm I (accessing elements
2n
times) and algorithm II (accessing elementsn
times) are both linear in complexity (O(n)), which is still considered reasonable.
How I Can Improve
- Review Big-O notation and understand that linear time (O(n)) is still efficient for large inputs.
- Recognize that polynomial (O(n^2)) or exponential (O(2^n)) complexity is what makes an algorithm unreasonable.
2. Counting Unique Elements in Lists
Question Overview
This question required me to correctly count the number of elements appearing in one list but not the other.
My Answer (Incorrect): C
Correct Answer: D
Why I Got It Wrong
- My approach improperly removed duplicates before merging lists, which led to miscounting.
- I didn’t correctly account for the unique elements before combining both lists.
How I Can Improve
- Break down steps carefully when dealing with list operations like merging, filtering, and set operations.
- Visualize list transformations step by step to track where elements are lost or double-counted.
3. String Manipulation with Concatenation & Substring
Question Overview
This question involved manipulating strings using Substring()
and Concat()
functions.
My Answer (Incorrect): D
Correct Answer: A, B
Why I Got It Wrong
- I misunderstood how substrings and concatenation were applied sequentially.
- My selected method improperly reordered parts of the string, creating an incorrect final output.
How I Can Improve
- Practice more string manipulation problems with functions like substring extraction and concatenation.
- Carefully trace variable states to see how each step modifies the string.
Final Reflection & Next Steps
Strengths:
-
Strong grasp of algorithms and programming: I performed well in most algorithm-related questions (92% accuracy).
-
Excellent understanding of computing innovations and ethical concerns: I scored 100% in all questions under these topics.
-
Solid debugging and error correction skills: I successfully identified and fixed errors in most programs.
Areas for Improvement:
- Algorithm Complexity: I need to reinforce my understanding of what constitutes reasonable vs. unreasonable runtime.
- List Manipulation & Unique Element Counting: I should practice merging lists and filtering unique values more methodically.
- String Processing & Order of Operations: I need to trace variable transformations carefully when dealing with substrings and concatenations.
Action Plan for Improvement:
- Review Big-O Complexity: Work through examples of O(n), O(n^2), and O(2^n) to recognize efficiency patterns.
- Practice More List Problems: Use LeetCode or AP CSP practice sets to reinforce list operations and set differences.
- Work on String Manipulation Exercises: Focus on tracing substrings and concatenation functions to improve debugging accuracy.
Final Thoughts
This MCQ exam was a great way to assess my knowledge, and I’m happy with my overall performance. While I made a few mistakes, they were learning opportunities that will help me improve for future tests. By focusing on algorithm complexity, list operations, and string manipulation, I can strengthen my weak areas and ensure even better performance next time!